"Michael Burry's recent critique of Palantir Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:PLTR) strikes at the heart of the moat debate in the software industry. Burry, famous for his contrarian views, suggests that Palantir's competitive advantage is not necessarily its superior predictive modeling or its Gotham interface, but rather a sophisticated form of vendor lock-in characterized by the obstruction of data transfer. The NYPD Controversy Burry's argument centers on a public dispute between Palantir and the New York City Police Department."
"The NYPD alleged that after years of using the platform, Palantir refused to provide data in a format that was easily migrated to other systems. Don't Miss: Specifically, the department claimed they could not access the analytical insights and "tags" their own investigators had generated within the software. From Burry's perspective, this is Palantir's business strategy. This is a story from 2017. The NYPD had been with Palantir for 5 years, and wanted out."
A prominent contrarian investor asserts Palantir's competitive advantage arises from vendor lock-in created by obstructing data portability rather than superior predictive models or interfaces. The claim centers on a public dispute with the New York City Police Department, which alleged that Palantir refused to provide data in migratable formats and blocked access to analytical insights and investigator-generated tags. The dispute dates to 2017 after five years of NYPD use, during which the NYPD developed its own Cobalt system to work with an IBM product. Palantir maintains customers own raw data while the software's organization, linking, and visualization comprise its intellectual property.
Read at Aol
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]