Andy Burnham argued that terminating HS2 in Birmingham would lead to a reduction in rail services across the North, making trains slower and less efficient. He pointed out that running HS2 trains on the already congested West Coast Main Line would result in inferior services compared to existing conditions, limiting capacity for double-length carriages and high-speed transitions. Burnham's emphasis on these operational challenges illustrates the dire need for the full realization of HS2 to enhance transportation in the region.
Burnham proposed a more affordable alternative to HS2 called the Midlands-Northwest Rail Link, emphasizing that this project would connect Lichfield to High Legh near Warrington. He described this plan as a solution that can address the pressing transport challenges facing the North at a significantly lower cost. By leveraging private investment, this alternative could help mitigate the regional transport crisis while offering a less costly approach to modernizing and improving rail connectivity.
Expressing urgency, Burnham warned that Britain is 'sleepwalking toward a transport nightmare' if investments in modernizing infrastructure, particularly in light of growing demands on the West Coast Main Line and M6 motorway, are not made. His comments, bolstered by findings from the National Audit Office, highlight the risks associated with inadequate rail capacity, which threaten the economic and infrastructural resilience of the North.
Burnham called for the extension of HS2 from Old Oak Common into Euston Station, advocating for improved connectivity between the North and London. He insisted that it is essential for people in Northern England to conveniently access central London, a position that underscores the importance of integrated transport solutions in fostering economic growth and accessibility for the entire region.
[
Collection
]
[
|
...
]