Biglaw Firm Bounced From Case Over Private Equity Work
Briefly

Allegations of potential conflicts regularly arise in bankruptcies but rarely result in disqualifications. The unusual Enviva decision illustrates how power has become concentrated in the hands of a relatively small number of law firms that dominate a restructuring scene made up of troubled companies and the investment houses that back them.
A handful of larger firms have also grown deft at turning their private-equity clients into a pipeline of bankruptcy work. When a client's investment turns bad, law firms can apply to represent the interests of its portfolio company in bankruptcy. That can require taking positions against the private-equity sponsor.
Judge Kenney said that the conflict was large enough to lead to disqualification because V&E can't delegate the reorganization task, and some of its lawyers work on Enviva and Riverstone matters simultaneously. And that's a giant deal for the way massive Biglaw firms that have their hands in both the PE and bankruptcy cookie jar do business.
Read at Above the Law
[
]
[
|
]